Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: Lack of Serious Guilds?

  1. #1
    Ironheart
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Phyll
    Posts
    291

    Lack of Serious Guilds?

    Does anyone else feel like there isn't much to do any more? Each realm has one guild that controls every city already, and each realm only has 1-2 guild(s) trying to take them away.

    It's the same result over and over and when the other "Small" guilds eventually make it to LvL 3 they won't stand the slightest chance.

    Anyone else feel that way?
    Shock - Druids - Blaze of Fire Dragon (Quit)
    Phyll - Storm of Freyr

  2. #2
    Lightbringer Boroeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Host of UpRising.
    Posts
    844
    Yup. We do, UpRising, controls 5 cities and soon going to control another 4 due to upgrade of LVL 4 guild..
    Boroeast
    Guild: UpRisingII
    Fire Realm

    "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt,"

    Abraham Lincoln




    Quote Originally Posted by Boroeast View Post
    Come one now (: Is just a game, have fun buddy!
    One of the wisest things said on this forum to date!

  3. #3
    Ironheart
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Phyll
    Posts
    291
    Yea it's kinda' sad.

    My guild created a second (bro/sis) but no one wants to join it, it's like they think they are getting somewhere, but they only climb 500 funds a day...
    Shock - Druids - Blaze of Fire Dragon (Quit)
    Phyll - Storm of Freyr

  4. #4
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Dragons
    Posts
    9
    there should be a limit of cities each guild can have lets take Boroeast guild if they was to hold all 12 cities in that realm. it wouldn't be much fun for the players not in his guild. that would cause coiners not in his guild to leave the game hurting tynon even more

  5. #5
    Ironheart
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Phyll
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by WarKnight View Post
    there should be a limit of cities each guild can have lets take Boroeast guild if they was to hold all 12 cities in that realm. it wouldn't be much fun for the players not in his guild. that would cause coiners not in his guild to leave the game hurting tynon even more
    I sort of do and don't agree with you. I mean, my guild has worked hard and now control all 5 starter cities. Yes, the 100% Rep bonus is nice, but that does cause a lot of players to lose hope and quit.
    Shock - Druids - Blaze of Fire Dragon (Quit)
    Phyll - Storm of Freyr

  6. #6
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Dragons
    Posts
    9
    yes it will then how fun will it be to only have ur guild fighting for any city ? my guild is on Blaze of Fire Dragon server fire realm level 3 dragons now going to level 4 . like your guild ready to upgrade to level 4 the smaller ones in your realm won't ever stand a chance. without a chance of getting a city from you they will start to die off. without a city limit for guilds most will find a another game

  7. #7
    Forum Moderator Jupitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Olympus
    Posts
    421
    If there are several guilds who reach level 3 near the same time, they can all challenge a city of the larger guilds....it's much more difficult to defend multiple cities at once, there is no real way to do it.


    Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
    If You Want Peace, Prepare For War

    Forum Rules|Tynon Wiki|The Green Dragon

  8. #8
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Dragons
    Posts
    9
    but enjoy it while u can once 4-5 other guilds get to level 3 then the real fun will start trying to defend all of them at same time

  9. #9
    I have thought about this not only with guild war but other aspects of the game. The beginner part is so small and brief that guilds or players that dont rush to the top get left behind. If your not in a guild that is the top the players dont sail or guild war and lose the 100 percent assistant. I doubt it could be really changed at this point but some sort of level guild war probably would have been better. Such as guild level 1 cities. Once a guild goes to 2 they can no longer own or take them. Level 2 cities etc.

  10. #10
    There needs to be a limit on the number of cities 1 guild can own

    4 cities look to be a good number

    Once they conquer the upper cities they need to let go of the lower level ones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •