-
First, I just wanna say that it most certainly was not a jab. Trust me, if I have a problem with someone they know about it. I'm being sincere.
The questions about the rules and stuff were't so I could don the bifocals and put together a Supreme Court case... I just really would like to know. I'm like you, I just sign and move on too... It's like that episode of South Park in that regard...
I know I am making a big deal out of what many see as "nothing". But it's not nothing if it happens to you. You chose to leave, the others didn't.
I agree that bug exploits, hacking, and yes even language should be the primary focus of the Game Operators. I like the term "Questionable Actions". I'm asking if there might be a system where "Questionable Actions" could be heard. I know it would take manpower and time to do so, but it makes sense to me. Since so many want to compare this to other games... I play (sometimes) a free online game that has a player based review board. Once a player is "REPORTED" they review the report and submit punishment or whatever.
If we had a similar mechanic here, the community could govern itself. A player could have their reputation lowered as a punishment, for example. Or even be demoted if the infraction is deemed serious enough. Repeat offenders before the board of review could even face a temporary ban. Anything more than that should come from Game Operators. If a player decided to be a jerk and knows they could face consequences, they may think twice.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules