The way it's displayed (5 cards and you "pick the one") gives the illusion that we are dealing with a 1/5 chance to get the one we want depending on what card we select.

This however is as we all know NOT true, hence the game is "rigged", we do not have the chance that we are lead to believe we have.

If it was truly random and the shuffled cards accurately represented the 5 cards previously displayed then selecting the spot where the "good" hero that we wanted was displayed at first should net us an 1/5 success rate (one out of every 5 shuffles the hero should remain at its original spot), even accounting for some randomness in the variables of a small sample-size we should still see a LOT more hits by just clicking the spot where the card was (i know that statistically the chance is the same regardless where you "hit" but hitting the "old spot" gives an easy to track "pattern"). Also, as long as you don't "hit the old spot" the hero will still be there after the select making it appear as if the shuffle had left it in its old spot)

As it is now I'm about 1/30 for hits using the "hit the old spot of whatever i want" method, and that is extremely unlikely to occur in a true "select one of 5 shuffled cards. Add to that that multiple participants (if not all) are showing the same highly skewed results it becomes near impossible unless the game is rigged.

Not saying its bad, or that it shouldn't be, just saying it is.