Quote Originally Posted by MisChief View Post
Suggestion: relax matt. Let them digest all the info, suggestions and feedback and they will decide. At least they gave us the courtesy to ask our opinions.

Summary of what i have read would indicate that the majority are against these changes as described in the original question. Many alternatives, suggestions, arose from the feedback. Some excellent, some not so much. I hope what comes of it is a decision that keeps the game fun, interesting, warlike and with the players staying.
Quote Originally Posted by EVILSIDE View Post
WAIT A MINUTE: What kind of strategy is it to lose cities? Feedback is what it is, but my personal opinion about your feedback is (YOU DONT HAVE A CLUE ABOUT GUILD WARFARE TO BEGIN WITH).
in order to have strategy there must be a possibility to loose or else there is no point having a strategy... at least at the server (non server wide wars) i play cities are owned by the same guilds for the past month... and i don't see that changing because no new guilds are created in order to attack those cities. Game has become so boring that you can see that active players aren't more than 30 in each guild. So if something doesn't change soon more players will become inactive.