I have not been here long and do not know the intricacies of the game, but I am learning. These two suggestions go toward providing younger guilds a better opportunity to grow better, and compete, and provide younger players more competition to keep interest.
Like idea posed for two arenas if it is possible.
BarbaraElla
I like the idea of Guild War on a more competitive level. Not sure about the server wide aspects. One thing I would mention is a post by another player in which the idea of limiting the number of cities a guild can have at any one time. I like that idea which would keep monopoly from happening and be more competitive than one round battles which result in mutual boredom. My concern of increasing these events to server wide would only change which of the dominant guilds reaps more rewards. This is not a solution for the smaller guilds other than forcing them to consolidate their powers. As already stated this may be the end goal of the development teams and present it here as a more member selected option.
I am not sure if this will be a solution to GW or not. At 1st look, you would think smaller guilds would have a better chance, but after thinking it over...I think it would be the same as it is now. On server 2 there are 5 top guilds holding all the cities (as I am sure is the case on most servers 1-10). If I understand Dawn correctly, a guild will need 1 city to get a 100% buff. 5 rep cities, so each of the top 5 will own 1 and the smaller guys still have no chance. 4 of the next, so one of the top guilds will always battle for it. The remainder of the cities are 1 city each, so I guess that is where the guilds will really battle. Maybe the solution would be a guild can only have 3 max cities? or maybe cities reset back to npc's once a month? No matter what we suggest, it will throw a rod into an already glitched game. I think the biggest problem in GW is that you can garrison in B and take A. There is no strategy in GW. Even the top guilds are bored with it. Rolling the dice to choose a city to move to would be more fun than the way we do it now lol.
This thread is becoming a book!
Looking forward to Dawns reaction and what will be done with all this input.
What I find really nice to see is that all are essentially asking for more of Tynon.
More depth, more options, more additional game-play, more sensation!.
We must really like this game.
~ You are just jealous 'cause the voices only talk to me..~
~ There is a crack in everything, that is where the light comes in~
~<3~
I seriously think the only way around this is to create an all new Guild Warfare and Arena, Apart from the Realm GW and Arena's we already have. Each Realm should have it's own cities like now, plus the server should have 10 main cities that the entire server can compete to capture, once they reach a certain guild level. By this time, we can assume that the strongest guild in each realm will have most of the good realm cities, so in order to not create super guilds, we put a cap on the Sever GW cities. Maybe 2 per guild. This way there is constant fighting going on to gain the buffs from the cities you don't have. Just as long as each city has a decent buff, you can bet that GW will liven up quite a bit. As far as the Arena is concerned, a server wide Arena would be great for the higher level players, giving the lower level players more flexing room in the realm Arena's.Originally Posted by Klepto
I think we have come to the conclusion that this is the only answer to the issue at hand.
Please excuse the bad grammar and capitalization, it's 2:42 am here and I'm whipped
-- Deuc
"Thank you for your constantly supporting on Tynon!"
How about you Mods go answer some FeedBack in Evony??? Or is it that you don't care for those of us who are left??
Most Servers have major Tech issues that need to be addressed (if you cared to read the threads that is),but that's ok stay here and hide..
Evony?? This is not the place to go not only off topic, but off game!! LOL wow -.-
Back to the topic at hand. How would making one arena perk things up? The way i see is the players just farm the crap out of each other, you don't even know when you are hit. You would spend all day minding stakes, no i don't like that idea one little bit. It is still hard to grow enough to move up the ladder much. Best you can do is one or 2 at any given time. You grow - they grow. It would be like taking the stats page, and putting it in arena, with bubbles. FFS That's just nuts imho.
This game will go the same way as Evony MisC, they will suk you dry and spit you out,,that you can count on
I made the stupid mistake of donating my hard earned to this lot. Since I went that path, I found more and more of my game shutting me out, eg. Hero realm. am lucky to see decent hero, never catch them. armour, I can buy it cheap, or win constant staff of hope. Yo talk about arena. well, It is a waste of time to any but the larger players, they take the % up.. rest get 9/10 fek all. If you cant play late at night, you dont get the benefits. so , smaller players say.. FEK YOU.. and leave. Still, on our server, we all get L map only..is only a few weeks now.. who cares? No ONE. Making new guild wars and arena wars wont save your game from going to nothing. Smaller players have no access to anything, cant grow without the access.. to my way of thinking, this Idea of Guild wars and arena war changes, reeks of holding onto your larger payer base, whilst ignoring your smaller base. Now for me, I dont care any more as I am leaving your game. You may keep the near $100 I poured into your coffers, as a gift of my stupidity. Someone Mentioned Evony, I left that for here..thing is, your just as bad as them. Now, I shall go look for another game.. One where game bugs are given the flick.
already has... already has.. another browser game to burn from the list..
talk about killing the golden goose ?
Posting Permissions
