Mounts, Embeding Gems and more

[onlyforgames_2692961]

Tynon,

Why are Mounts in this Game? For Real 100kk coins for a white bear? or 1B coins for Dragon? Why should ppl buy them instead of using this coins for runes or blacksmith? This Mounts dont even give any bonus so its a waste of coins buying them.

Second: This Gem costs of 100 gems for lvl 4 gems? You kidding the Tynon players for Real. You should make it for free also like the others gems i would understand if 100 gems are needed for lvl 5 gems which u dont get so often. But for lvl 4 gems? Really thats so sad to see this.

Also what about Ragnarok? no more comment its useless but i hope within new patch it wont be useless anymore.

Fourth How about Talking about Lady, you should make another event for getting more credits because ladys on servers who have tons of players hmm i dont know if this is a good idea for real. on Server 76 where i play many ppl get 100k only after 30 sec spawn of lady.

Ty for reading this if you read it.

Greetings

[Klepto]

Fourth How about Talking about Lady, you should make another event for getting more credits because ladys on servers who have tons of players hmm i dont know if this is a good idea for real. on Server 76 where i play many ppl get 100k only after 30 sec spawn of lady.

Other topics have been discussed a lot before but as for Lady, I think it should scale based on how many players are actively competing. If 40 players hit Lady, the first 20 should get more than 100k IMO. If only 20 hit, then the current system is fine. If 30 hit, the first 15 should get more than 100k.

This would obviously mean the first round always starts out like the current system, extracts the number of players competing, then devises a way the next round to divvy up the greater-than-100k credit values among the top half of those who find her. It doesn't matter to me if it adds 100k per player (so 40 players nets a 2 mill top value), or if it tops out at the current 1 mill and some players get the same amount (e.g. for 40 players, 2 people get 1 mill, 2 get 900k, etc.).

Just my thought on how to balance it out. Older servers could/would obviously benefit from increased rewards here anyway, even up to the 3 mill+ range, potentially, to make it worth it for the bigger players.

[Deucalion]

Other topics have been discussed a lot before but as for Lady, I think it should scale based on how many players are actively competing. If 40 players hit Lady, the first 20 should get more than 100k IMO. If only 20 hit, then the current system is fine. If 30 hit, the first 15 should get more than 100k.

This would obviously mean the first round always starts out like the current system, extracts the number of players competing, then devises a way the next round to divvy up the greater-than-100k credit values among the top half of those who find her. It doesn't matter to me if it adds 100k per player (so 40 players nets a 2 mill top value), or if it tops out at the current 1 mill and some players get the same amount (e.g. for 40 players, 2 people get 1 mill, 2 get 900k, etc.).

Just my thought on how to balance it out. Older servers could/would obviously benefit from increased rewards here anyway, even up to the 3 mill+ range, potentially, to make it worth it for the bigger players.

^Agreed 100%. Lately if I even am around for NL, I hang out in the circle. If she doesn't spawn there, I don't bother running around for 100k. If she does, then I try to get her first, and more often than not, I miss out even if I was lightning fast. NL should be reconsidered and updated to current standards. Things aren't the same as they were 4 months ago.

[Andy]

Other topics have been discussed a lot before but as for Lady, I think it should scale based on how many players are actively competing. If 40 players hit Lady, the first 20 should get more than 100k IMO. If only 20 hit, then the current system is fine. If 30 hit, the first 15 should get more than 100k.

This would obviously mean the first round always starts out like the current system, extracts the number of players competing, then devises a way the next round to divvy up the greater-than-100k credit values among the top half of those who find her. It doesn't matter to me if it adds 100k per player (so 40 players nets a 2 mill top value), or if it tops out at the current 1 mill and some players get the same amount (e.g. for 40 players, 2 people get 1 mill, 2 get 900k, etc.).

Just my thought on how to balance it out. Older servers could/would obviously benefit from increased rewards here anyway, even up to the 3 mill+ range, potentially, to make it worth it for the bigger players.

What would happens when more players join in after the first round? Should the number od players that get the higher rewards go up? How about if the number of players go down?

[mattp169]

See i Have a solution to all this

Switch over to all 11+ style GWF
get rid of realms
convert the arena to a tiered system that you can move up tiers but not down-each tier gives better rewards then the lower one
get rid of the cities we have now
attach the full bonuses we have now available from cities to the guild level so level 3 guilds get 100% rep bonus level 4 guilds get 150% coin/credit bonus etc
merge the museum into guild level
add a NL tech
add new cities one of which gives noble lady bonus, the other cities give totally new bonuses that we would like - im having a brain fart at the moment so i can't think of new ones - maybe double stamina regeneration - double xp bonus-double arena rewards, etc
no cap on number of cities you can hold, any city can be attacked by any level guild.
make max level of gems 8- level 15 will take over a year to craft one even if you buy all 390,625 level 7 chips required to craft a level 15 chip from the fair
make a patch that warns you of the removal cost of level 4+ chips before embedding
when this patch goes on unembed all level 4+ chips from everyone on every server - this is a one time thing since there was never any warning on the cost to remove a level 4+ chip before embedding
then leave the cost to remove the level 4+ chips - but maybe cut them in half
make guild cool downs work like all other cool downs
remove the boost from ragnarok

OH and before doing all that
Fix the bugs/glitches (GWF,power display, server sync, lost items, black widow elite, etc)
And gives us all the new heroes up through general

Yeah taht would solve a lot of issues

[BigPapa]

100 gems for removal of lvl4+ gems is highway robbery. It should simply be removed.

[BigPapa]

Mounts actually do improve your speed, but you don't really see the increase till you get to the panther and beyond. I'm curious whether the speed increase doesn't somehow subtly impact combat as well, but this is pure speculation.

[Revan]

Back when the game was still in development the mounts apparently were more than just aesthetic, but then they changed their minds on some stuff and rather than remove them entirely they left them for purchase at increasingly exorbitant prices. Sorry that I don't recall it more clearly and I can't remember what thread that was posted in, but someone on the Tynon team did post about it.

[Rakm_1438325]

Feed them, you get alot of power. However it can get costly,i have a 4 star black horse, and it boosted power level by at least 150,000. and the price rises, guess what the money you get rises with that level of power needed to obtain the mount.Not only that but look at the limit of people able to by the mounts above leopard, for example only 3 more
can get the Rinoserus and my server is fairly new.

[ChickenWing]

I call dibs on necro