Championship Warfare Results: Seasons 1-4

[logi_2957934]

You do realize that not every high lvl player is in the first 20 servers? You would have some players who can make it to the quarter finals and even the finals in the current CW system with very little if any competition in the 21-60 servers and again in the 61- current servers.

Not every high lvl player, but MOST of the high lvl players come from the first 20 servers. I think Execdude is probably the only player who made it to the top 16 who was not from the first 50 servers?

So a breakdown of servers, something like....1-25, 26-50, 51-75, 76> or 1-33, 34-66, 67>......any of these would give newer server players a chance at acquiring some nice rewards, like the current CW is doing for the players from the first 20 servers or so

Tynon stated they wanted to have a CW to see who was the strongest? They did that, and rewarded those that got far in the CW handsomely. Congrats to them. But having more CWs setup exactly the same way is going to reward the same players again and again?. Is that what Tynon is intending here? If so, then the Tynon staff members playing/top players from the older servers of course, have a much greater influence than they should?

[Herby]

You do realize that not every high lvl player is in the first 20 servers? You would have some players who can make it to the quarter finals and even the finals in the current CW system with very little if any competition in the 21-60 servers and again in the 61- current servers.

Grouping by server age is the only category that will not infringe on others.

You would not want to penalize players because they're more powerful than others, spend more time playing than others, have invested more money than others, etc.

If you group servers by age, then it would give all those involved a level playing field to start from.

[logi_2957934]

Grouping by server age is the only category that will not infringe on others.

You would not want to penalize players because they're more powerful than others, spend more time playing than others, have invested more money than others, etc.

If you group servers by age, then it would give all those involved a level playing field to start from.

I would welcome that opportunity with open arms

[hjam_8879649]

Grouping by server age is the only category that will not infringe on others.

You would not want to penalize players because they're more powerful than others, spend more time playing than others, have invested more money than others, etc.

If you group servers by age, then it would give all those involved a level playing field to start from.

Your still going to have players complaining about the Over Powered player on say server 40 or server 80 that win the CW everytime in their server groups , so that wont work, may as well keep it the way it is, the only fair way is brackets for lvls. 40 to 60 lvl player and then 60 to 80 lvl player then 80 to 95 then 95 to 110 or some such and have 1st through 5 th place prizes per Brackets. so like 4 brackets, with 4 sets of prizes that are appropriate for those levels , then as you lvl up you can look forward to the next bracket with better prizes. But I don't see Tynon changing CW anytime soon.

[Nooberix]

Your still going to have players complaining about the Over Powered player on say server 40 or server 80 that win the CW everytime in their server groups , so that wont work, may as well keep it the way it is, the only fair way is brackets for lvls. 40 to 60 lvl player and then 60 to 80 lvl player then 80 to 95 then 95 to 110 or some such and have 1st through 5 th place prizes per Brackets. so like 4 brackets, with 4 sets of prizes that are appropriate for those levels , then as you lvl up you can look forward to the next bracket with better prizes. But I don't see Tynon changing CW anytime soon.

Herby's idea has merit as most can live with a player who has invested money in the game to be powerful and move on. But the general reason for people voicing not fair is they are grouped with players from an earlier server which coiner or non coiner gives them an advantage over the later servers. But with Herby's idea that can be nullified.

[Kruize]

The only way to do it with Herbys idea would be to severely reduce the awards. Like Aphrodite and KT wouldn't be appropriate for servers 60+. Blood and Adamanti cards would do and a leader card for top 2 only. Blue medals instead of purple. All seem like server life relevant progression rewards.

[logi_2957934]

Herby's idea has merit as most can live with a player who has invested money in the game to be powerful and move on. But the general reason for people voicing not fair is they are grouped with players from an earlier server which coiner or non coiner gives them an advantage over the later servers. But with Herby's idea that can be nullified.

Totally agree Time, is a huge factor in this game...I am sure I'm not alone, having many a days with a dozen+ scrolls with no stamina?

[Nooberix]

The only way to do it with Herbys idea would be to severely reduce the awards. Like Aphrodite and KT wouldn't be appropriate for servers 60+. Blood and Adamanti cards would do and a leader card for top 2 only. Blue medals instead of purple. All seem like server life relevant progression rewards.

Agree with that

[hjam_8879649]

The only way to do it with Herbys idea would be to severely reduce the awards. Like Aphrodite and KT wouldn't be appropriate for servers 60+. Blood and Adamanti cards would do and a leader card for top 2 only. Blue medals instead of purple. All seem like server life relevant progression rewards.

ummm no, server 84 has exdude with 170 mill power....so your going to tell him he cant have the same rewards as server 1 through 10 or 20......and there are others on servers other then 1 to 20 , this whole group server idea wont work period , only thing that will be fair is if they group them by lvl and or power, and use a bracket system.

Plus who made Herby the self appointed Tynon programmer changer dude lol....

[Revan]

Based on everyone's arguments, it looks like there is no solution that would be "fair".