Flavius vs Calvin

[Andy]

I am thinking of using my 1/2 Angel 5 Calvin to transfer to Flavious. It looks to me that other than even though Flavious has 50 less HP and 5 less strength the improvement on the other stats is well worth it. Any thoughts?

[Herby]

For banish, pve (quests, heroic) or pvp?

[Andy]

Since I will be removing the saints and star from Calvin, it will be a replacement (retire Calvin and start using Flavius).

[Wildflower]

How about doing it on Lancelot.

[Morgan le Fay]

Flav skill only hits opponents with morale. Mages and physical heroes with no morale aren't affected by him. In PvE situations he's usable but not great but in PvP he excels.

Flavius

• Pros-he hits all targets reducing their morale by 33%
• Cons-his Warcry only affects opponents that actually have morale, otherwise no damage is inflicted

Calvin

• Pros-Hits single target doing a fair amount of damage wiping morale out completely
• Cons-Only hits a single target but makes him more useful in Banish...

[Andy]

I thought that as an archer he would still have the physical attack. He does have Physical Attack 1637 and for some strange reason Magic Attack 1449.

[Andy]

How about doing it on Lancelot.

I want to keep one morale drainer available. I am building up another purple to transfer to Lance.

[Morgan le Fay]

I thought that as an archer he would still have the physical attack. He does have Physical Attack 1637 and for some strange reason Magic Attack 1449.

He still does have a physical attack. All physical heroes have a mage attack too, very peculiar but there you go.

[Wildflower]

For banish, pve (quests, heroic) or pvp?

This is a very important question Andy. It does really matter what you are using him for and how your gear is at the moment.

[Andy]

I am using him on everything. I understand the tradeoffs better now. Thanks.