Championship Warfare Idea..

[Darkyy]

Hey all,
To start off today's topic i would like to say i love participating in the Championship Warfare, It is a great way to get everyone together an see where we are all at. To battle for the best. I have supported this Since day one that it came out. The improvements i would like to see down the road would have to be of the following.

So like in Football they have more than just 1 for the top teams, So my idea for this would have to go in the lines of power brackets. I am sure someone has talked about this but i would like to put my own 2 cents about it. So as i was saying, It would be cool for like people 1m-10mil to be in a battle 11m-20m ect...ect.. This would make it so you Have a chance at actually being in the final fight's instead of the people from servers 1-12. I mean its great to see them but it be nice if there was more than only 1 final stage. Like have 4 winners from those Brackets w/ less reward of course since they are not as high in level/power.

I know this could be posted in ideas for Tynon, But i would rather just see what people have to say about the Subject first before i even think of taking such an action. Well that is pretty much all i have to say about it for now. An once more i like that update but it would be nice to see in time that they extend it for those who are smaller. I am not saying this only on my behalf i mean shoot i am only 9.8mil power on my Current account, But i do have a 32m power account i just Cba w/ playing anymore.

Feel free to Agree or disagree i will be checking on this Frequently to see what you all have to say.

-Darkyy

[g346007_1906957]

This would favour anybody in the low end of the bracket. Also... I would be designing a team that is strong for it's power... maybe get my adam down to 7m, with mainly offensive stats and just have him and main in the formation. I should be able to nearly one shot anyone in my power range.

[Rumbleguts]

Yup, massive ways to exploit a bracket system based on power or level.

[Morgan le Fay]

One thing I have noticed is with CW many are winning by having powerful Adamanti's. It's starting to go a bit like Ragnarok "he/she who has stronger Adamanti wins".

Makes it tricky to determine who's the better player.

[Herby]

One thing I have noticed is with CW many are winning by having powerful Adamanti's. It's starting to go a bit like Ragnarok "he/she who has stronger Adamanti wins".


Makes it tricky to determine who's the better player.

The Adamantis are starting to top out.


Level 100 swords, level 100 spirits.
Level 100 talents.
Archangel saints.
Justice and Judgment gear with all open chip slots.


A few more weeks and you'll see maxxed out Adams that are not going to improve anymore.
Meanwhile, all other heroes are going to just get better.
And since almost everyone upgrades armor the last, the damage those Adams do will only get less and less.
Pretty soon, the Adams will do only medium damage that new strategies would start to come out.


So give it some time, and Adam will not be the focus of a formation, but be part of the formation.

[Herby]

To make things fair, I believe they should group CWF into server brackets instead of timezones.
Then find a neutral timezone to hold CWF.

Servers 1-10, 11-30, 31-60, 61-most recent.

A neutral timezone example would be:

8am CST
10pm Asia/Australia
2pm Europe

[Revan]

Power is not a very accurate way to compare players. I would hope that is something we have learned from CW if we didn't already.

[g346007_1906957]

Formation matters too much for power to be a good estimate. While we are suggesting ideas for CWF:
For betting, I think they should have a time window where players could not adjust the formations, and then we could actually see their formations and then make the bet.

[DrthCaedus]

Personally(this idea was suggested on another thread) I'd love the idea of having the top 4-8 sit out 2 CW's after achieving a top 4-8 finish. They would still be able to bet, etc...but unable to participate. This would open up the field to a much larger number of potential victors instead of a small group consistently achieving the same rewards bi-weekly easily outpacing the rest of the competition.

[Wildflower]

Personally(this idea was suggested on another thread) I'd love the idea of having the top 4-8 sit out 2 CW's after achieving a top 4-8 finish. They would still be able to bet, etc...but unable to participate. This would open up the field to a much larger number of potential victors instead of a small group consistently achieving the same rewards bi-weekly easily outpacing the rest of the competition.

I think that is the only way to make it "Fair".
No matter how you group the players together, there will always be ones in a disadvantage of others.
If we do it by server age you still have a range. How big will that range be and those at the bottom of that range will again be at a disadvantage.
Also you could end up just fighting your own server again and the variety on servers is huge, eventhough some started at the same time.
It would not solve much.

The only way to avoid the winners just growing from every CW is by benching them or putting them in a Championship league of their own.