Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42

Thread: Hero Sanctification Improvements!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Ok so here we go again, Tynon "improves" something but it cost gems to do it......every god damn time you improve something you want us to sink more gems /money into this game to use the new "improvement" How about doing some of these things so it doesn't cost gems for a change and maybe, just maybe players wont leave like rats from a fire. Dont you guys get it? Its seems that all you are concerned about is getting us to use "more" gems and to hell with player retention. Well so be it then, but at some point there wont be players to use your bloody gems.

    I will add this, I am sure that you put in lower Sancs just for this reason , so you can make an "improvement" later on to try and get us to use more gems. As are the other gems traps in this game.

    I dont really care what others think either so flame me if you want but you know I am right.
    Last edited by hjam_8879649; 02-08-2014 at 02:52 PM.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by hjam_8879649 View Post
    Ok so here we go again, Tynon "improves" something but it cost gems to do it......every god damn time you improve something you want us to sink more gems /money into this game to use the new "improvement" How about doing some of these things so it doesn't cost gems for a change and maybe, just maybe players wont leave like rats from a fire. Dont you guys get it? Its seems that all you are concerned about is getting us to use "more" gems and to hell with player retention. Well so be it then, but at some point there wont be players to use your bloody gems.
    The gem costs are justified.
    There's no point in this feature being free.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Peeta Melark View Post
    The gem costs are justified.
    There's no point in this feature being free.
    Thats fine, sit there in your Ivory tower and make comments like that while those under you move to other games etc, like BooYaaa has said, 04 04 06 isnt that far away.

  4. #4
    Not many Tynon players know what ESO is.
    And to those that know it, only a small fraction will enjoy it.

    ESO is a hardcore rpg game.
    Very far from what Tynon is.

    Besides, you can't even play ESO on most laptops lol.

  5. #5
    Forum Moderator Morgan le Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Clarity
    Posts
    2,023
    Quote Originally Posted by hjam_8879649 View Post
    Thats fine, sit there in your Ivory tower and make comments like that while those under you move to other games etc, like BooYaaa has said, 04 04 06 isnt that far away.
    As Peeta said ESO (and it's equivalents) are hardcore gamers games, which compared to Tynon that caters for multi-level isn't for everyone. It's also subscription based which again not everyone is prepared to pay for and that doesn't include the cost of the initial purchase. Some of the claims being made here are overblown.

    I'm beginning to get slightly irked by some who are using ESO as some kind protest. I'm sure the owners and developers of ESO would be horrified to see their game being used as some kind of leverage again another games company, who aren't even coincidently a competitor of theirs considering it's a different game category.

    So I'm asking you all to politely stop this ridiculous behaviour and if you are planning to play ESO, good luck with it.

    Now back on topic. Personally I think this can be a useful idea and certainly useful for lower sancts. However, it's also optional and therefore if you don't want to pay for sanct removal or risk multiple cards, you don't have to.

    Forum Moderators are volunteers and are unable to fix in game problems

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan le Fay View Post
    As Peeta said ESO (and it's equivalents) are hardcore gamers games, which compared to Tynon that caters for multi-level isn't for everyone. It's also subscription based which again not everyone is prepared to pay for and that doesn't include the cost of the initial purchase. Some of the claims being made here are overblown.

    I'm beginning to get slightly irked by some who are using ESO as some kind protest. I'm sure the owners and developers of ESO would be horrified to see their game being used as some kind of leverage again another games company, who aren't even coincidently a competitor of theirs considering it's a different game category.

    So I'm asking you all to politely stop this ridiculous behaviour and if you are planning to play ESO, good luck with it.

    Now back on topic. Personally I think this can be a useful idea and certainly useful for lower sancts. However, it's also optional and therefore if you don't want to pay for sanct removal or risk multiple cards, you don't have to.
    I agree with Morgan on this.
    And its rare, I admit, that we see things in the same light.

    But definitely, all this ESO comparisons should stop. It's like comparing Flappy Bird to Wii Sports.
    Different platform, different market, different game type.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Herby View Post
    I agree with Morgan on this.
    And its rare, I admit, that we see things in the same light.

    But definitely, all this ESO comparisons should stop. It's like comparing Flappy Bird to Wii Sports.
    Different platform, different market, different game type.
    Well it doesnt matter about game platforms,subscriptions, etc.

    ESO just happens to be the thing on a lot of players minds right now so its being used as the comparison

    The fact of the matter is - If you are going to do something and ask people to pay you for it - You should do a good job. And the problem is we dont feel uCool is doing the best job. The biggest issues are
    -communicating with players
    and
    - resolving customer support issues

    SO regardless of its ESO or Tynon - If you are a for profit business you should do what your doing well if you expect the money to keep coming in.

  8. #8
    Ironheart jkwongfl_7919855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Nomadz
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Herby View Post
    It's like comparing Flappy Bird to Wii Sports.
    The most random games to choose for your illustration... lol
    my naga, my naga

  9. #9
    Forum Moderator Andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sol
    Posts
    2,885
    I have some questions on this latest patch.
    1. On sanctification if I use multiple cards and check the box to pay Gems to keep them if it fails do I get to keep all of them?
    2. On the new attack option in the rankings:
      1. Do you give that player a revenge?
      2. Do you get coins and credits if you win?
      3. Do you loose coins and credits if you loose?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy View Post
    I have some questions on this latest patch.
    1. On sanctification if I use multiple cards and check the box to pay Gems to keep them if it fails do I get to keep all of them?
    2. On the new attack option in the rankings:
      1. Do you give that player a revenge?
      2. Do you get coins and credits if you win?
      3. Do you loose coins and credits if you loose?
    1. Don't know. I'm leaning to a yes, as it doesn't make sense paying more than 100 gems per saint attempt, since you only gain 1 saint.

    2.
    a. No
    b. No
    c. No

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •