My sixth Sense says

[Nooberix]

Not very helpful for my server as we would be lucky to have 6- 8 active players

[Yelsha]

Not very helpful for my server as we would be lucky to have 6- 8 active players

Change it so you have unlimited moves, but you don't heal between rounds. Add lots of AOE monsters. That way, a strong enough player with good enough defenses and a powerful Maria can carry the guild at lower levels.

[andreasl187_6103403]

we have 2 active guilds on s88 and 1 guild owning all cities, since we get so much more then the other guild in coins/creds/rep theres just no hope for them to ever catch up so yea either a nerf in what number a guild can hold or as was sayd long ago that they were checking to bake the cities in so a guild needs 1 city of 1 type for full bonus.

[mattp169]

Ok Ive done it. my massive plan to fix alot of complaints on every server

Matts Massive plan to improve tynon

[kaisim_2492829]

Ok Ive done it. my massive plan to fix alot of complaints on every server

Matts Massive plan to improve tynon

makes me feel glad that you are not a developer

[Cuddles_1461020]

I don't know about this one Matt.

I think this will change the foundation of what this game is all about. GW is a good thing if they place some sort of limt such as how many cities a guild can hold at any given time.

Let me see if I can clarify.

Lvl 3 guild (max 1 cities)
Lvl 4 guild (max 2 cities)
Lvl 5 guild (max 3 cities)
Lvl 6 guild (max 4 cities)
Lvl 7 guild (max 5 cities)
Lvl 8 guild (max 5 cities + lvl 8 bonus ?)

+1.

By preventing monopoly, promotes more competition, and therefore more interesting GWs.

[mattp169]

+1.

By preventing monopoly, promotes more competition, and therefore more interesting GWs.

I am not for the idea of a glass ceiling 0 which many are advocating with this limit on how many cities you own. I am not sure how well that will work on servers that are already dead. Plus teh max bonuses form cities are almost needed to have a chance of getting things down in a time before you die. Say rep for example. Getting the 100% rep bonus as early as possible in the game is crucial to ever reach 3.8m rep for marshall. Now even if you disagree on how long it should take to get to marshall, think about a new player under this system - only being able to get a 20% city bonus or if I fully understand the proposal by pussyriot - having to chosse how many rep bonuses you have versus other bonuses, makes it appear to new players that getting to marshal is going to take 2 years maybe 3 or 4.

ALso pussy riots suggestion. You basically can choose which cities you want so at level 7 you may have 3 that give coins/credits 3 that give rep and 1 for pirates - which i like because this adds strategy. But with those limits I do not see much added competition on established servers.

A level 6 guild can hold 4 cities, so the dump the chest buff maybe dump 3 rep buffs, dump the pirates buff and 1 coins/credits buff.
Now on an established server how many other level 5 and 6 guilds are there to get the pirates and chests buff? I do not know - Could be several on most servers or none. Then 1 other guild gets the other rep and coin buffs.

SO while I applaud pussy riot for thinking this idea out - I am not positive it will work out on the established servers the way it is intended.

Once again make the buffs tied to guild level not the cities so all guilds can have them - then do something different for guild wars where the rewards are coins/credits/exp/rep only. I feel this is the best solution