Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
Thanks for the feedback guys.

I can say that we definitely don't want one guild holding every city, as has been happening. It's not interesting if a there's no chance for losing. But there still may be changes coming to GW until the balance is right.
A big Thank You to Tynon for making GW competitive again.

For months our guild would dominate the server-cities. Smaller rivals gave up. Boring.
And I would be able to solo entire armies B-->A. Boring.
It was still mind-numbing for me to just sit at B forever and watch all the others try to nibble away at me. By the end of round 30, with 20 players attacking me every 3rd round, I'd still be at over 50% health. Boring.

And now we see on these forums ... the Bad Sportsmanship. "We have competition now. THIS SUCKS!!". Even more comical are those who react so drastically with their Poor Sportsmanship that they threaten to change their spending habits.

When we lose a city, we say Congratulations! You outmaneuvered us, outnumbered us, overwhelmed us, wore us down, and now the land is yours. Well done! (Hint: In Real Life, War is not so much about power as it is about numbers, tactics, and organization. Even the greatest warriors don't stand a chance to a well-organized army.)