View Poll Results: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?
- Voters
- 212. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
-
No
-
Some sort of
-
I don't know.
-
Well to be honest NOONE knows how many people are unhappy withe CWF change. About 3 people on the forums said they think its unfair to the past winners, and 10 or more said they like it as is. SO even though 1 of the 3 complainers is the biggest spender, I am not sure it needs changed yet and before you make an adjustment you should let a couple cwfs play out to see if the crown system even changes anything
In regards to GWF though we have had 6 or more people who have never posted or posted in a very limited fashion complain about these changes plus plenty of regular forum players. SO I think that says that the changes are so drastic that it has brought people to the forums to complain so a change may be necessary.
Increasing rewards does not solve the issue this change made which is basically the 20 smallest players on the server could take a city form the 20 strongest.
While I sort of like the concept that was done I think it went way too far at once. I suggest one of the following tweaks.
1.Cut everything you did in half.
5% power boost for a maximum of 50% per city owned to the attackers
2 durability loss for a win - 5 durability for a loss
OR
2. Keep 1 change and disable the other.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules