View Poll Results: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

Voters
212. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    66 31.13%
  • No

    108 50.94%
  • Some sort of

    33 15.57%
  • I don't know.

    6 2.83%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 9 of 26 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 254

Thread: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

  1. #81
    Champion
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Forged S129
    Posts
    98
    I think the new changes to guildwars are totally unreasonable and the fact that they were brought in together makes them that much more so. The durability one is making people that never wanted alts to make them and is unfair to those who want to play honestly. Put it back to the way it was, or witness what happened to evony age 1 all over again. I am sure there is a random guy somewhere that is working on a way to make it easier for them to log multiple alts now that the game has created such an incentive to. The penalty for owning city's is so wrong and ignorant its not even funny. My guild fights as many as 6 defenses a night so why should we have to fight against supper buffed opponents? There are so many ways to make it more fair without destroying the competitiveness of the game. As far as CW is concerned I think in time it will destroy this part of the game as well. There has to be restrictions on how far you can go with these buffs in both events. Please, just be intelligent and reasonable, that's all that us as players want is a competitive, fun game not Altwars and Boostwarfair.
    I think a reasonable compromise would be 1/2 the current buff applied only to the base offense and defense stats not to the dodge, critical, hit rating, life and such. I watched numerous battles in last nights guildwars (and this is after we already lost 2 citys the night before) in which i did enough damage to kill the opposing player 3 times over so i know the health buff is not implemented properly.

  2. #82
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by Amina_3602443 View Post
    I play on server 87 and I want you to know this new GW change is terrible, We are the big Guild in our realm with no other big guild to fight, now you penalize us for being big by handicapping us to the point that a guild with little to now power can with the city. This is absolutely ridiculous. We have already shared cities with friendly guilds and now you are sabatouging our efforts to make this a great realm. What a stupid system!!!!! We are the ones who spend the money not the little guilds and you make it hard on us, so what is the incentive to grow now? So at the moment I will not be spending further gems on this game, it makes no sense to do so!
    And this is the penalty you get for your guild (DragonRdrs) for monopolizing into a 1-guild server. You already decreased the population. Many on our server came from s87 and were very grateful our server didn't turn into yours. Now (believe it or not) you need to fight for your 7th 8th 9th city.

    On one hand I'd say "I'm sorry for your loss", but on the other hand I'm more sorry for the people you drove away from your server and came to ours. Hmmmm then again, maybe our server should thank you.


    Cuddles' Law: The volume of a player's whine is directly proportional to his/her VIP level.

  3. #83
    this is re player pointing out 'problem' with new rules in GW about being spammed with tons of alts

    oh please seems the strong players are finally for ONCE getting beat and they dont like it those dish it out but cant take it players always amuse me We have NO alts in our alliance but the strong overpowering alliance (who has EVERY GW city) on our server is chock full of them All of us in our alliance have gravitated here because since tynon TOS said no alts we believe alts to be cheating and we dont do it that i am aware

    Id be most happy to have players with same ip address disallowed completely not just in same guild wars city battle 3/4 or more of the strong guild on our server would just disappear and what about the players who have quit and left their log ins to the alliance?

  4. #84
    Justice
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post

    Thanks for the feedback guys.

    I can say that we definitely don't want one guild holding every city, as has been happening. It's not interesting if a there's no chance for losing

    If this is the true end goal then limit the cities one guild can hold. That would include every guild on every server, and not single out the few realms or servers that have only one or 2 with any real challenge for them. If you don't then people may flock more to the big guilds that easily hold all the buff cities to get the benefits, rather than make GW more competitive. It's just discouraging to see what you worked hard for, fought for every nite, swept away with a few keystrokes by Devs. I reiterate, this was not tested prior to being put on. Unannounced, and really unexplained just how the mechanics worked. Defending guild could not see this extra city buff, and therefore were left baffled as to why it was so slanted. No one changed anything, no alts were poured into the guild on either side, but the change was drastic. Again we say; "We have just been Tynoned" Bent over and .........

  5. #85
    Forum Moderator Morgan le Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Clarity
    Posts
    2,023
    It seems there are misconceptions being bandied about. In GWs, the problem is with the city power boosts and the rate of durability. In the original set up one strong from the dominant guild could one shot the challengers. It was grossly imbalanced everyone agrees but now we have the opposite problem, one tiny guy can one shot the defenders. It's simply too ridiculous for words. No one is suggesting one guild should have all the city's but a better chance to defend them would be nice.

    Alts if they aren't now will become a problem as they'll be used to wipe out the durability of either side, namely the defenders.

    As for CWF I really can't see the need for more handouts to be given out because a player has won a few championships. Chances are they'll always be in the top 8 and therefore will always get something out of it. CWF should be about skill and strategy, not how deep someone's pockets are.

    Forum Moderators are volunteers and are unable to fix in game problems

  6. #86
    Quote Originally Posted by kthlndooley_219121 View Post
    I love the new changes to GW and CW. Now we have balance. No More 1 player wipe outs and ppl have to use a game plan to win. LOVE IT
    Yeah that's what hours and hours of grinding gear, upgrading stones, playing the fair, spending money on the game, doing Labs, racking your brain out on formations for HR and quest bosses will do for your account. Not to mention having great leadership who can work together and win cites in GW's. BUT I see your point I guess...why work for something you can get for free ;/ Why should the paying public be punished ...we did nothing wrong we followed the rules per how Tynon programmed them.
    Last edited by gunner2732_3577346; 03-19-2014 at 07:03 PM.

  7. #87
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    I agree Morgan

  8. #88

    GW is broken

    the first poll that I voted on still reflects my opinion, whether or not you closed it and redirected us here. I am about to throw up my hands in defeat. with the latest patch, the guild wars are messed up. first the attackers got so much extra defense and attack that they were winning against players far far stronger.. then. with all their alts, they were able to defend and STILL got extra defense and attack.. if it were balanced.. then my guild as the attacking guild should have had the extra defense and attack instead.. nope.. I'm about done with tynon. every time I turn around another patch messes things up worse. I so regret spending any of my money on the st. patricks day package. I will not make the same mistake again. last time I made the mistake to support the game, the reps were raised to a point to nearly force me out of the game. shame on me for being caught twice. It will be a very very long time before I make the mistake again. and most likely not in tynon. I can waste money somewhere else if this is how tynon treats their players. Guilds spend resources and time to build and defend their cities, and tynon has decided to hand them to people who have not put that effort into it. those winning the cities in this way need to stop thinking they won.. they didn't win,, tynon won FOR them.

    The point of tynon is to convince people to support the game by spending real money. you have just convinced me and I am sure others, that spending that money is futile.. whatever others might think of "coiners". they support the game. if tynon wishes to slap them in the face by this kind of patch, then tynon is destined to fail.

  9. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by DaBooMan View Post
    Although we haven't needed to for a while we have still always divided our power into the cities we had to defend never took anyone for granted.
    This way the new GW change has made very little difference to us.
    I know some other guilds on server lost cities due to not planning GW as they should.

    Good luck with that if you face an unscrupulous guild where all the members join with 5 alts, no matter how strong your members are they still lose 5 dura per battle fought... Doesn't have anything to do with prioritizing cities or judging what city need more powerful players to defend...

  10. #90
    Quote Originally Posted by Cuddles_1461020 View Post
    And this is the penalty you get for your guild (DragonRdrs) for monopolizing into a 1-guild server. You already decreased the population. Many on our server came from s87 and were very grateful our server didn't turn into yours. Now (believe it or not) you need to fight for your 7th 8th 9th city.

    On one hand I'd say "I'm sorry for your loss", but on the other hand I'm more sorry for the people you drove away from your server and came to ours. Hmmmm then again, maybe our server should thank you.
    Oh, 87? We have a few of their former players too.

    I don't feel bad in the least for the poster you quoted. She could give a couple cities to her map-farming alt guild to reduce the power bonus, or to some of those guilds already mentioned that kiss her rear to get cities handed to them. Something tells me ego is getting in the way - that or fear that, with just a few resources, this other guild could challenge them even if this durability rule is changed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •