View Poll Results: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

Voters
212. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    66 31.13%
  • No

    108 50.94%
  • Some sort of

    33 15.57%
  • I don't know.

    6 2.83%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 15 of 26 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 254

Thread: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

  1. #141
    Guardian
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Subversion
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by koja6049 View Post
    Gear? Are you talking about the Sirius set? I agree that shouldn't be changed. But otherwise the things mentioned here can be changed because they are events. You don't "buy" or "own" an event
    I believe what Bubba is referring to here is the power the gear gives the player. Power, along with a good formation, is supposed to equal kills. And, getting equipment up in power isn't simply a $$$ thing. You have to literally spend hours and hours working at it. To have your hard work rewarded by having your equipment nerfed gets really frustrating after time. And, the way GW is at present, power ends up playing a minor role - it's simply which guild can get a lot of players there to continually hit the other. There has to be a happy medium. And, I believe halving the durability lost for a win, and halving the bonus the other side gets for the number of cities owned by the opponent would at least come close to doing that.

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by JezebelMD_6540395 View Post
    I believe what Bubba is referring to here is the power the gear gives the player. Power, along with a good formation, is supposed to equal kills. And, getting equipment up in power isn't simply a $$$ thing. You have to literally spend hours and hours working at it. To have your hard work rewarded by having your equipment nerfed gets really frustrating after time. And, the way GW is at present, power ends up playing a minor role - it's simply which guild can get a lot of players there to continually hit the other. There has to be a happy medium. And, I believe halving the durability lost for a win, and halving the bonus the other side gets for the number of cities owned by the opponent would at least come close to doing that.
    Like I said, these are all events. You gear didn't get nerfed, you can still use your gear in arena, the wild, the seas etc. Did you complain when they gave you a chance to boost your gear during banish events or heaven palace? Think about it

  3. #143
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbaslabevony_2392091 View Post
    Still, a game without doubt isn't much fun.
    Precisely! I don't want a game that's too predictable. Otherwise I'd go play FarmVille.


    Cuddles' Law: The volume of a player's whine is directly proportional to his/her VIP level.

  4. #144
    Sirius kaisim_2492829's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Expunged
    Posts
    2,206
    without going through all the posts, i would like to give my 2 cents anyways and am sure its been said in some way already.
    on the pole i voted "no"
    because CW the changes done don't affect me. it seems that most are like "yay the big guys get nerfed" but who does it regard? i believe only the top5 percentile really cares about this changes and is effected by it. so now instead of the "same 3 people" winning it will be 5 who get a shot at it. thats just the way a knock out tournament works: the best player may win.
    now we have to start asking ourselfs if it is the best player who will win it now after the changes? in my opinion not, because the top players now get nerfed to have to hand over the pot of gold to the second or 3rd best. instead of the nerfing the players you should have nerfed the rewards system. instead of giving a huge amount of tickets to the winners, it should give you a random chest of rewards per win in the preliminaries and tickets during the knockouts. so the lowbies can have a fair shot too at getting something really nice (please make it real rewards like medals, cards, etc and if you have to include chips then make the smallest a level 4 or 5).

    about the GW i am really mad because on our server we have a competition of 3 leading guilds and the smaller ones now started creating alts and generate real imbalances. to be honest, the change to the GW was the worst so far and needs to be reset to prior conditions until a better solution is found and implemented.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    [...]This is likely a case of collective obsessional behavior (i.e. group delusion). This can spread rapidly through any group based on fear and rumors without any objective facts. We've seen it happen numerous times in Tynon already.
    Quote Originally Posted by Herby View Post
    The forums sure has fallen from grace, turning into a vent-fest, instead of people sharing ideas and techniques.
    Quote Originally Posted by riot View Post
    I choose to lose the way I do so I can get max tickets when I give up the CWF.

  5. #145
    Justice
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Riot View Post
    Thanks Bubba for posting it. I agree and it is unfair, but it is not just me, there are a lot of people who spent a lot of money to get to where they are at, and to them, it is also a bit unfair.

    I feel they should progress the game forward and not make changes that take things away. Add more harder hero's. Add more GW benefits for participating (to encourage more people to show up). Making such drastic changes is not right "after" people have made investments. We are not just talking about people who spent time, but a lot of money. This is a serious matter that needs to be addressed.
    I agree with you both!!!! We invested in our game to speed up the process and gain some advantage. When that is all taken away it totally discourages the investor. It is likely to result in them not spending more for sure. And for others to see what a waste it is so they won't bother. You can't keep taking stuff away that people earned just because others want it too but can't get it any other way than petition Tynon to change things, noobicize everything so it equalizes small accts vs big accts. Just does not make sense, not good business sense and certainly is a slap in the face of your biggest supporters/investors. And I mean investors of all sizes.

    More game and leave the stuff we earned the hell alone.

  6. #146
    Quote Originally Posted by Jessetheone View Post
    As some of you guys said the changes in mechanisms of these 2 mini games in the last patch has sabotaged the balance, we’re thinking to make following changes to regain the balance. Please let us know how you like these ideas.

    Championship Warfare
    For players who participate in with stars above their names, they will get extra 10% to 20 % Tickets in every battle for each star they shall carry on.

    Guild Warfare
    We’ll significantly increase rewards for each battle players shall participate in.

    Please comment and we’ll collect your feedback. Thanks!
    By significantly increasing the rewards for each battle players play in (meaning GW's) do you mean adding medals,stones,and gems?

  7. #147
    Guardian karatekristopher_1399892's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    soulbane
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by gunner2732_3577346 View Post
    By significantly increasing the rewards for each battle players play in (meaning GW's) do you mean adding medals,stones,and gems?
    i like this idea quite alot
    I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.

  8. #148
    This game has been "noobicized"


  9. #149
    Guardian
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Subversion
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by karatekristopher_1399892 View Post
    i like this idea quite alot
    The problem with that is that it doesn't fix the problem. It's simply rewards to try to keep us quiet about an absolutely horrible patch.

  10. #150
    Guardian karatekristopher_1399892's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    soulbane
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by JezebelMD_6540395 View Post
    The problem with that is that it doesn't fix the problem. It's simply rewards to try to keep us quiet about an absolutely horrible patch.
    that is true now that i think about it
    I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •