View Poll Results: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

Voters
212. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    66 31.13%
  • No

    108 50.94%
  • Some sort of

    33 15.57%
  • I don't know.

    6 2.83%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 16 of 26 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 254

Thread: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

  1. #151
    I like the crown idea for CWF but i think it would be better if they only applied during the rounds when you get to top 4 all crowns should be removed this will allow other people to have a chance at rewards rounds but we will still see who strongest in the end.

  2. #152
    I pay for power and i dont like not being able to protect my people in my guild in GW. GW is about power its not the case now. In 5 days i will be looking for a new game to play if GW is not returned back to its original operations.

  3. #153
    Ok this is starting to get ridiculous. Something really needs to be done.. We were the best guild with 10 cities. We are now down to 3 and still cannot defend with 22 people in one city!!! Seriously, Tynon admit you screwed up with this and do something!
    Last edited by sh0tyme83_7854100; 03-21-2014 at 02:05 AM.

  4. #154
    Quote Originally Posted by LTRindyboi4ever_1625052 View Post
    I pay for power and i dont like not being able to protect my people in my guild in GW. GW is about power its not the case now. In 5 days i will be looking for a new game to play if GW is not returned back to its original operations.
    Yup. This is absolutely absurd. Why should I be on equal footing with people who are not VIP players? I pay for an advantage, and I gain power, and yet due to durability damage a few players 1/10 of my size can completely nullify everything I have to offer. I will not be playing this game much longer in the current state.

  5. #155
    Seriously.. you haven't balanced anything by adding rewards for battles. How about correcting the imbalance of empowering alts instead of rewarding them. Many suggestions have been given.. increasing rewards was never one of them - except from your end.

  6. #156
    I think the new GW rules are a good thing. So far the smaller guilds are very happy to finally take a city from our power guild. I think this will help keep up the interest the game at least for awhile. We are now fighting to keep the three coin cities and to me there is lots more fun in the GW battles.

  7. #157
    losing 5 per kill is ridiculous, regardless of gaining buff for being the weak guild on the server, taking a city against 5 active and their alts ain't happening with this new system.

  8. #158
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    Can anyone name me a great warrior who solo'ed entire armies?


    Cuddles' Law: The volume of a player's whine is directly proportional to his/her VIP level.

  9. #159
    Guardian karatekristopher_1399892's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    soulbane
    Posts
    112
    totaly starkiller lol
    I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.

  10. #160
    Lightbringer
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by Cuddles_1461020 View Post
    Can anyone name me a great warrior who solo'ed entire armies?
    The Enola Gay and Little Boy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •