View Poll Results: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

Voters
212. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    66 31.13%
  • No

    108 50.94%
  • Some sort of

    33 15.57%
  • I don't know.

    6 2.83%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 21 of 26 FirstFirst ... 111920212223 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 254

Thread: Will these arrangements re-balance Guild Warfare and Championship Warfare?

  1. #201
    i have 1 question for the Tynon Managers :

    WHO THE HECK NEEDS BALANCE ON SERVERS WHEN THIS GAME IS ALL ABOUT POWER AND RULLING . NOW THIS SERVED ONLY NEWBIES AND NEW GUILDS , BUT IT REALLY KICKED OUT THE BIG GUILDS .

    THANK U
    KoRn666 , server 114

  2. #202
    #190 solving the B to A tactic can be done by letting the game allways start with the attackers on A and the defenders on G.
    And by putting a max to the number of cities a guild can hold eg 4 no guild can hold al cities. i think we should hang on to the defenders because not everybody can turn up on 19.00 hour.
    there should be a max eg one alt to a gamer. alts are recognised by a different e-mailadress and same working hours as main. a family member is recognised by a common part in the front part of an e-mail adress and different working hours when one ip- is used.

  3. #203
    Lightbringer
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by g346007_1906957 View Post
    If it's based on power... I would find ways to boost my power up... like putting magic attack on herja and stuff like that.
    first...wouldn't really effect you that much. Second it's silly to base it on power. No reason I should lose 5 durability when I beat a player that can only take 1 more hit due to having fought plenty of other battles only because they happened to start with the same power or more than me. Best solution is scale it with lost health from 1-10 1 durability for ever 10% so:

    0-10%=1
    11-20%=2
    ad infinitum

  4. #204
    The problem with CW is that some people have been playing a lot longer than others. It is unlikely that I will ever get more than half the power of players on low lvl servers, so the chances of me even reaching the 2nd round of games is close to zero, so the whole thing is pretty irrelevant, i just take my handful of tokens and get what i can with them. Until someone comes up with a way that a player with 10mil power hs a chance against 100mil player the 'championship' will be restricted to a hand full of players. Just live with it, you are here to be cannon fodder to the people who started early.

  5. #205
    It is kind of funny watching the GW after the patch, our server has 2 guilds about even in power and 3 little guilds, one guild had all of the citys due to battle strategy of the vice host that plans it. first day after the patch the guild that held all citys lost 2 citys second day it lost 3 citys third day lost 3 citys. At this point the guild only had Kolten. Day 4 they took Jengu, day 7 they took a coin city. Now the funny part is the 2 big guilds are at war and only attacking each others citys, so they each control 2 citys. the little low power guild controls 5 because the 2 big guilds are using all of the power they have to fend each other off allowing the little guild to swoop in and take the citys with ease. haha

  6. #206
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by lugnut_fxi_6829524 View Post
    It is kind of funny watching the GW after the patch, our server has 2 guilds about even in power and 3 little guilds, one guild had all of the citys due to battle strategy of the vice host that plans it. first day after the patch the guild that held all citys lost 2 citys second day it lost 3 citys third day lost 3 citys. At this point the guild only had Kolten. Day 4 they took Jengu, day 7 they took a coin city. Now the funny part is the 2 big guilds are at war and only attacking each others citys, so they each control 2 citys. the little low power guild controls 5 because the 2 big guilds are using all of the power they have to fend each other off allowing the little guild to swoop in and take the citys with ease. haha
    haha that's awesome!

    I have a suspicion that the Tynon Devs wanted it that way: to make it extremely difficult for any guild to hold on to more than 4 cities


    Cuddles' Law: The volume of a player's whine is directly proportional to his/her VIP level.

  7. #207
    Sirius kaisim_2492829's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Expunged
    Posts
    2,206
    Quote Originally Posted by lugnut_fxi_6829524 View Post
    It is kind of funny watching the GW after the patch, our server has 2 guilds about even in power and 3 little guilds, one guild had all of the citys due to battle strategy of the vice host that plans it. first day after the patch the guild that held all citys lost 2 citys second day it lost 3 citys third day lost 3 citys. At this point the guild only had Kolten. Day 4 they took Jengu, day 7 they took a coin city. Now the funny part is the 2 big guilds are at war and only attacking each others citys, so they each control 2 citys. the little low power guild controls 5 because the 2 big guilds are using all of the power they have to fend each other off allowing the little guild to swoop in and take the citys with ease. haha
    can be solved with ease if they put a little brain behind it and put two of the medium powered players (but still higher than the top 2 of the opposing guild) to defend what you have or put 3-4 up to take it back while the strongest and weakest fight the stronger guild. that may not be relevant tho if the lower guilds produced enough alts to wear the higher guilds down. that then is EXACTLY the point why this arrangement doesnt work out and needs to be fixed. making it more interesting is one side, but guilds taking cities that they should never deserve in the first place is just wrong.
    you guys are lucky, you have not only 2 major power guilds but additionally to that 3 minor guilds that are still active. you should come visit us, our server is reduced to 2 guilds and the second guild only got any cities because the strongest guild lets them have them and everyone is awaiting a server merger.
    Last edited by kaisim_2492829; 03-27-2014 at 02:25 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    [...]This is likely a case of collective obsessional behavior (i.e. group delusion). This can spread rapidly through any group based on fear and rumors without any objective facts. We've seen it happen numerous times in Tynon already.
    Quote Originally Posted by Herby View Post
    The forums sure has fallen from grace, turning into a vent-fest, instead of people sharing ideas and techniques.
    Quote Originally Posted by riot View Post
    I choose to lose the way I do so I can get max tickets when I give up the CWF.

  8. #208
    Ironheart Cuddles_1461020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    +Scandal+
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by kaisim_2492829 View Post
    you guys are lucky, you have not only 2 major power guilds but additionally to that 3 minor guilds that are still active. you should come visit us, our server is reduced to 2 guilds and the second guild only got any cities because the strongest guild lets them have them and everyone is awaiting a server merger.
    It's not a matter of luck, it's a matter of discipline and maturity. They chose to keep the competition alive, and apparently served them well with maintaining a high population. As you go through each of the servers you will find this is the case. 1-guild servers = reduced population (even among the 1 guild), even if the one guild is nice. When the competition dies, the fun dies. Boredom then seeps in and people look elsewhere for ... competition. Challenge. Because that's what made the game fun in the first place. Then those that DO remain have nothing to do but twiddle their thumbs and beg for a merger, and then half of these that recently server-merged simply repeat the same mistake.

    What fun is having an All-Star team that can never lose? This other server chose to have 2 teams, you and yours just one. Your server would do well to follow their example: *Create* two (or three) teams. Diversify: have your guild Dominate two or three realms instead of one and face off against each other. Or you can do a draft. Anything to keep the competition alive.

    The choice is yours; you choose with your actions. The consequence follows.


    Cuddles' Law: The volume of a player's whine is directly proportional to his/her VIP level.

  9. #209
    Lightbringer
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Pheonix
    Posts
    868
    Quote Originally Posted by Cuddles_1461020 View Post
    haha that's awesome!

    I have a suspicion that the Tynon Devs wanted it that way: to make it extremely difficult for any guild to hold on to more than 4 cities
    Its not that difficult to hold all cities
    In server 14 we hold all cities except for koleton mainly because we do not need that buff.
    Just a bit of logic, tactics, and few strategies here and there you can easily control all cities ... and no im giving no one our method of dominating gw :P

  10. #210
    Justice
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Cuddles_1461020 View Post
    It's not a matter of luck, it's a matter of discipline and maturity. They chose to keep the competition alive, and apparently served them well with maintaining a high population. As you go through each of the servers you will find this is the case. 1-guild servers = reduced population (even among the 1 guild), even if the one guild is nice. When the competition dies, the fun dies. Boredom then seeps in and people look elsewhere for ... competition. Challenge. Because that's what made the game fun in the first place. Then those that DO remain have nothing to do but twiddle their thumbs and beg for a merger, and then half of these that recently server-merged simply repeat the same mistake.

    What fun is having an All-Star team that can never lose? This other server chose to have 2 teams, you and yours just one. Your server would do well to follow their example: *Create* two (or three) teams. Diversify: have your guild Dominate two or three realms instead of one and face off against each other. Or you can do a draft. Anything to keep the competition alive.

    The choice is yours; you choose with your actions. The consequence follows.
    That is a good idea.. break up and make stuff more fun. Problem therein lies rebuilding a guild to the levels needed to bid on and go for the higher cities. That takes a ton of time, investment and money. Most are invested where they are, and don't wish to restart at square one. IF there is a small guild you could join, fine, but many of them are small for a reason, and then who hosts, leads, etc can be an issue. So what is a sound idea has limitations too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •