Quote Originally Posted by JezebelMD_6540395 View Post
The whole reason you get more if you bet on the underdog and win is so people will watch to see just how well each player is doing. The looser gains 5% attack/defense each loss. It's extremely hard to win all 11 bouts in the final. The 'art' is trying to figure out just when the underdog will win the bout(s) he/she will actually win.

And, the fact that there's one person that happens to be so far ahead of everyone else should have nothing to do with how many tickets one gets. It wasn't all that long ago we didn't even have CWF and the ticket system. It's not our right to get as many tickets as possible, it's something you should be actively engaged in - though from the sidelines. Banning someone because some feel they're not getting the tickets they 'deserve' is kind of selfish, in my opinion. I mean, you get tickets even if you pick the wrong person as the winner.
Ahh but you see teh real point of cwf was to see who the best is. That question has been answered. SO the point now is to get as many tickets as you can. ANd pussy riot skews that drastically. It takes away alot of the fun of cwf.

Lets say you dont make knockouts. And your first knockout fight is pussyriot. Then you are stuck betting on him for the entire cwf. Making it so you cant get the extra tickets if you bet on the underdog and he/she wins. How is that fair to the betters on the side line.

I dont want pussyriot punished - he can be automatically awarded the max tickets and the prizes of 1st place for all i care. I just dont want to have to be forced to bet on him. SO I want him eliminated form the competition, because he has none.