Originally Posted by
kaisim_2492829
sorry matty but honestly i dont like it. the first thing that i dont like about this is your "obsession" that it should be cheaper to feed lower mounts than higher mounts. also i think the higher mounts having more HP is also reasonable because they invested a significantly higher purchase price. great job on the table tho, but no thank you. on second look at the current system i can see that its designed to suck gems out of you for the gem feeds and they dont care how much coins you are spending unless you can reach it in a lifetime. so my suggestion is to simply leave the current system as is and only change the amount of gems being spent. i would simplify it and just reduce the cost it takes for gem-feeding to a from 1-3 progressing stages.
so so from 1-5 stars i would charge 1gem
6-10 for 2 gems
11-15 for 3 gems
and at the end it would cost them .... uhm you do the math on that? lol something around 25k gem i believe which according to the current "game standards" (if there is such a thing) would make them spend a reasonable amount on gems and encourage lower players to throw gems at the mount instead of coins.
Reply With Quote