right, i totally get where you are coming from, on the other hand i dont agree with someone spending 1 billion for a mount and then having to pay x8 the amount to feed it as someone paid for a mount came free from quest. however thats in my eyes a different issue. we really here have several issues that need resolving: time it takes to feed for coins, amount of gems it takes to feed, the amount of XP gained on either and for some the amount of coins it takes.
the difference between you and me is that i am totally fine with the amount of coins for the feed. i disagree on the "lifetime" it takes to feed it on the coin feeds and especially on the gem cost. see the game is designed to make you buy gems and they dont care about what you do with them as long as you spend them.
lets micro this for a moment here and make an example: i have not spent a single gem yet on a feed of my pet because i think 15 gems is too high and/or 200 XP is too low for the amount. but if it was cheaper, in the beginning lets say 1 gem for 200 xp, i would have spent a couple hundred by now...
so when we go back to the bigger picture considering this, i like your idea, but it doesnt make is spend gems, it focuses on a redistribution of feed amounts and times, where i dont think its needed. i think the coin feeds are just fine and i dont need a change. i actually intend to say they hit the nail on the head with it and the plan is obviously to force people to speed it up and feed them with gems.
my daughter got a 5 star white horse that should be 6 tomorrow



Reply With Quote