Quote Originally Posted by class662_4733823 View Post
here is my question to all of you:
lets assume there is a guild holding all the cities, who got all the strong players, great strategists and mega coiners. the other 2 realms went dead and that flat server is waiting for the next merger of servers. now there is a couple of guilds left on the other realms with mediocre players that have a lot of alts and screamed for a change in GW "empower us!" (the same that cry about 'high seas'!?).
why would you think they deserve any city?
now after you answered that question i ask you a rhetorical one: why do you call it "fixed", "fun again" and "interesting" and assume there is strategy involved when the only strategy is the tactic to dodge the durability draining alts and advance when your spies tell you to advance?
So you are saying that GWs shouldn't be competitive, fun and interesting for all because only the top guild 'deserves' to win.

This patch was really for future new servers and merges, rather than existing ones. However, it's made GWs less of a dead event on most servers and given everyone a chance to enjoy a real fight rather than 5 minutes B to A done and dusted, thank you all.

Quote Originally Posted by kaisim_2492829 View Post
+1 excellent point
You would agree to class662, you both have the same IP address.