You can get safety deposit boxes at the bank. It is a secure place for your valuables. The point is, people understand what a bank is for and it seems like they needed a shorter word for the purpose of display and we don't need to argue over the semantics of a word. Maybe I was too harsh on you and I apologies for that, but you have to admit you were very harsh with your statements about the devs which I think were uncalled for as well. Afterall, #1 is frivolous nitpicking on word semantics, #2 is cosmetic and has other implications.
Last edited by Rocco; 04-29-2014 at 06:48 PM.
Has nothing to do with me being a business owner, I don't expect entitlements from a GAME. You were gone, tuff luck, I understand for a medical condition, but they don't put games such as baseball on hold because a player is hurt and they have contracts, unless you have a contract with tynon quit posting multiple threads about this.
Only as defense against Flavius. Morale sancs are okay early on in the game, but pretty useless later on. It would be awesome if it was +15 RETAIN morale. It would be a nice gesture from Tynon to remove it from the game so that we don't have to spend gems to remove it. I think anyone who has a morale sanc would appreciate that.
The decision is Tynon's to make. The facts are:
- The point of this campaign is to encourage players to come back.
- Players are provided with certain means to catch up so that they do not fall behind too much.
- Legolas is back (after 28 days) without being invited by the campaign.
- He can't catch up. He would be in a better situation had he come back 2 days later.
There are valid points on both sides. If I had been gone for a month, I would probably not come back, or I would start on another server.
Tynon needs to decide if it works in the gray zone or in black and white.
i agree with boo on this one and would like to have the same rewards for not leaving and continue to spend money. also, you can look at it this way: he got sick too early and should have stayed 2 more days. also the guy who was on the news where the bridge collapsed over him should get a do-over and pass it 2 seconds earlier... you getting the point?
You see, this is the problem. You make presumptions. You presumed that uCool made a mistake and implied they didn't have a working brain. However, clearly #1 and #2 were design decisions. If you had said that in your opinion, you disagreed with this design decision, that would have been valid because it's not possible to get everyone to agree on design decisions.