Banish Cap - Yes another thread

[mattp169]

It's unfair because I mainly got there because the people stronger than me moved to other realms or quit. I think it gives me an unfair advantage over the people from servers 1-10, who will never be able to get that high %.

Oh now your getting to the crux of another issue with the cap.

See most of the top players on 1-10 are heavily invested on their server and are unlikely to start a new server to catch up to blayd and spend even more money.

So I dont think you getting 80% or anyone getting 80% of the banish damage is unfair to your server, SINCE ITS UNDERPOPULATED AND YOU NEED MERGED.
But it does give you an advantage over players for 1-10. Because we are too heavily populated to have 1 person do 80% of the damage- Although it could be possible if we realm jumped just the right way to align the server to allow 1 player on the server to do it. However we are too competitive to do that. And it will cost other players significant damage.

Now is this advantage you get over server 1-10 unfair??? NOPE. Its bull**** and wrong for uCool to treat the older servers this way. But it snot unfair its how the game was setup and nerfed.

SO even considering what you say is UNFAIR - Its not unfair for any reason. You deserve what you get because you earn it. But servers 1-10 are getting screwed in so many ways with this cap. ANd iwth many other things in the game.

Some of which could be solved with some seriously massive merges - and not thos emerges they did last time that was nothing.

I say all servers get merged so that there is at least 100 active players (and not alts - and yes tynon knows which are which - they just cant prove it) per realm per server. Which imo means server 1 even needs a merge Because we are close to that in some realms but not quite.

I mean whats the point of a level 8 guild being able to hold 100 members if there arent even 100 players on the server?

If they did a round of merges like this - Alot of us would be crying out for the 31.25b banish in a month or 2 with no cap. This will also seriously limit the growth of those players who are basically on a dead server doing 80% of banish damage - meaning NO NEED FOR A CAP.

[mattp169]

It's 40m credits.

No its not going to hurt anyone. Just your guildmates in forest realm. It's not the cap thats hurting them. Its you and Spec raking in most of the rewards. If you feel so bad for them, don't boost.

so im suppose to screw myself becuase tynon changed the rules FOR NO REASON BUT TO PUNISH OLDER SERVERS

[Herby]

They could also increase income from other events and/or add new events so that banish doesn't become an event where you must show up or you will fall far behind the other players.

This ^^^^^^

[Herby]

Now is this advantage you get over server 1-10 unfair??? NOPE. Its bull**** and wrong for uCool to treat the older servers this way. But it snot unfair its how the game was setup and nerfed..

Don't include servers 2-10 on your personal rant.

No one from servers 2-10 is complaining here. Not even from other realms in server 1.

It's just you.


If you want more coins and credits, move out from forest realm. and spin the casino a lot more.

[mattp169]

Don't include servers 2-10 on your personal rant.

No one from servers 2-10 is complaining here. Not even from other realms in server 1.

It's just you.

1st off water realm server 1 has chimed in and agreed.
secondly - servers 2-10 will feel the pain of server 1 soon enough. we have all gotten teh short end of the stick on so many things in this game - this banish cap is one of the biggest - YOu may think 2-10 dont need the caps removed - they will soon enough.

[kaisim_2492829]

i still vote for giving out lv6 chips to the 1st, lv5 to the 2nd and lv4 to the 3rd-5th and lv3 to the 6-10th ranked on the higher 1.25B banishes and maybe even one step higher on the 6.25B one. but putting 500m coins into the pot i think is too much. as is i am already getting 50m per banish i do and yeah it would be great if i'd get x5 the amount it being fair to the others? i dont know about that. i'd say raise the level of chips and the count of how many getting a reward and slightly raise the coins of lets say add 50m to the pot.

edit: oh and dont forget to exempt the #1 player from the 10m rewards

[Herby]

1st off water realm server 1 has chimed in and agreed.
secondly - servers 2-10 will feel the pain of server 1 soon enough. we have all gotten teh short end of the stick on so many things in this game - this banish cap is one of the biggest - YOu may think 2-10 dont need the caps removed - they will soon enough.

Doom on you.

Doom on you.

Looks like i have to wear my tin foil hat.


Hey its past 4-4-2014, and Tynon's still here.

I thought you and your buddies would be ignoring tynon and playing that "other" game that you so foretold will spell the end for Tynon?

[perawind_8762856]

- peeks in -

(same old stuff. no, tynon believes that the cap is there for a reason)

- leaves -

Well some people were getting over 20mil gold from banish. Now I'm neither for nor against a cap. (Although the cap should be higher for the 6.25mil banish)

However, priorities are priorities. Currently banish rewards are ok imo. If any event is in desperate need of a reward buff it is rag. Tynon should adjust the rag rewards upwards first. And also, why should banish give the most rewards anyways? Both banishes are during 9-5 work hours and it would be unfair to those who are only able to the lower payout events in the evening. Events should have a more evenly distributed reward system so it doesn't punish players for not being able to play during certain times. Doubling the guild wars rewards did much to help address the current imbalance. And certainly more could be done to improving income from arena reset, such as scaling arena reset income better for those in the 11-50 positions in realm arena. So everyone doesn't get the same 40000 gold everyday in those spots.

[DaBooMan]

Again some of you have actually missed Matts points.

Its UNFAIR because there are other players of lesser size on newer servers who are gaining alot more due to less competition.

Why should people work for almost a year to get to a point, where you could start a new server invest half the time and money and gain more from events that we have been doing day in day out for months.

We worked hard to get our 6.25b cerb, took it down with 10 mins left, i scored 1.7b at 80% boost but still gained less than i would of from a 1.25b cerb.

At the end of the day, the people who invest heavily on newer servers are who tynon wants to take care of. This is a dead end arguement that Tynon aint to bothered about.

Look at is this way, if any of the top guys from servers 50+ had to start on server 1-10 they would be no where near the size they are today.
Anyone that would like to prove me wrong, I lay down the challenge to you.
Compete at server level not just at CWF.

[Herby]

Again some of you have actually missed Matts points.

Its UNFAIR because there are other players of lesser size on newer servers who are gaining alot more due to less competition.

Why should people work for almost a year to get to a point, where you could start a new server invest half the time and money and gain more from events that we have been doing day in day out for months.

We worked hard to get our 6.25b cerb, took it down with 10 mins left, i scored 1.7b at 80% boost but still gained less than i would of from a 1.25b cerb.

At the end of the day, the people who invest heavily on newer servers are who tynon wants to take care of. This is a dead end arguement that Tynon aint to bothered about.

Look at is this way, if any of the top guys from servers 50+ had to start on server 1-10 they would be no where near the size they are today.
Anyone that would like to prove me wrong, I lay down the challenge to you.
Compete at server level not just at CWF.

I bet Blayd would still kik your azz even if he started on server 1 same time as you and matt did