How to fix the unfairness issue while still maintaining World Boss realm cap

[Herby]

If not 2 out of 3 banishes, I'd like the 2 banishes to be spaced out more. 10am and 3pm are too close.

10am and 7pm would be a better option in my opinion.

Scrap Ragnarok, or move it to the 3pm slot. It's the most useless mini-game.

[kaisim_2492829]

Kaism your not taking into acct that players liek exec, myself and many many others can easily solo 1.25b banishes. YOur point seems to make sense, but it would probably balance out on most servers.

This is as good of a solution as others.

SAVE REMOVING THE CAP...which is the best solution.

i am absolutely taking that into account, i do 60% on my server on every day with 60% buff and we kill it within 40 minutes.
i still dont agree on on removing the cap, i think it can stay as is and dont worry about the coins, what counts to me is that at our levels and where a good half of most players are is that level 3 and 4 chips just dont cut it anymore and i think its sloppy on the developers side to increase everything in the banish regarding, power, HP, coins, credits... but from the 1m banish thru to the 6.25 banish the winner gets a level 4 chip, lv3 for the 4 runners up... why not a level 6 for the winner, 5 for the 2nd and 3rd, 4th and 5th gets a lv4 and the 6-10 a level 3?

It is not a horrible idea when it enables players to play the game.. At least half of the players on my server would be able to participate in TWO banish events instead of just one if there was a later time available in the day as most people i know work during at least one of the Banish events. This isn't going to create a problem or a Logistical nightmare as you call it.. in fact it will elevate participation.. And if a single player wants to handle the 1.25 Baal all by themselves.. then all is fair.. there is a cap and its not like they can run off with all of Tynon's coins. Everyone else can share the spoils of the other two events. Should make everyone happy.

did you even read what i wrote and digested it before you answer?
i can only take my server as an example since i only play on one server:
forest realm: 4-5 participants on the 25m banish with 2 players playing 1 alt each
water realm: 0-4 players (yes thats right, we had NONE show up twice) battling the 5m banish
fire realm: 5-25 players battling the 1.25B banish (your guess who develops faster, and i am asking ALL players not only the big guys!)
in our banish 4/5 participants get more coins and credits than in any other of the banishes and now you want to add 3 more banishes AND restrict them to 2 per day? (thats right its 3 because its for 3 realms!) you go ahead and try to coordinate the entire server you are on, but i guarantee you that no one else will do that on any other server to spread out the players to not fall on all banishes (except the 2 where the top guy is) behind to the 25 or even the 5m banishes.
i am not sure if you understand that i would embrace a banish for myself, finally being able to boost 100% again and pull of 80-100% at it, hog the 10m bonus everytime and have no more troubles with 200m coins daily... i am saying this is a really bad idea for everyone else, except for the top dog of each server.

You see 3 banishes might be good for your server but our server has low activity and banish ranges from 2-9 people on average 5. So 3 would scatter us out more and would then be worse off. So you have to take into account that every server is different and just cause this will help out a few people it wont help everyone.

finally someone who gets it! ty

[BLITZBLITZWOLF_4797025]

At 500m power, I would expect you to beat the 1.25b hp banish boss in 40mins by yourself.

Why are you stuck in the 250m power boss only?

its not necessary to be 500 mill player to kill 1.2b banish
300mill can hit avrage 3% per minute 40 minute 100%
if you have 2nd sub 4% per minute with L110

[Moonshadeaux_3172622]

1.25 boss dead 18 minutes, 10 players Top guy was 74 mill power and did 44% of the damage

[g346007_1906957]

1.25 boss dead 18 minutes, 10 players Top guy was 74 mill power and did 44% of the damage

Wow. I think that's better than what I do (I roughly average 2% per fight).

[lostinhouse_815896]

You see 3 banishes might be good for your server but our server has low activity and banish ranges from 2-9 people on average 5. So 3 would scatter us out more and would then be worse off. So you have to take into account that every server is different and just cause this will help out a few people it wont help everyone.

Your server is in desperate need of a merge which is also something that Tynon claims to be working on. They really ought to concentrate on merging servers that need it and fixing problems that exist before opening up new servers. It's a load of crap whenever i get a message in the mail that says all servers are full.. so they are opening up a new one when in fact there are a couple of servers that are dying. There is a mass imbalance out there that Tynon seems to be ignoring.. Servers that need help.. Servers that need attendance.. players that have run out of things to do...

i am absolutely taking that into account, i do 60% on my server on every day with 60% buff and we kill it within 40 minutes.
i still dont agree on on removing the cap, i think it can stay as is and dont worry about the coins, what counts to me is that at our levels and where a good half of most players are is that level 3 and 4 chips just dont cut it anymore and i think its sloppy on the developers side to increase everything in the banish regarding, power, HP, coins, credits... but from the 1m banish thru to the 6.25 banish the winner gets a level 4 chip, lv3 for the 4 runners up... why not a level 6 for the winner, 5 for the 2nd and 3rd, 4th and 5th gets a lv4 and the 6-10 a level 3?



did you even read what i wrote and digested it before you answer?
i can only take my server as an example since i only play on one server:
forest realm: 4-5 participants on the 25m banish with 2 players playing 1 alt each
water realm: 0-4 players (yes thats right, we had NONE show up twice) battling the 5m banish
fire realm: 5-25 players battling the 1.25B banish (your guess who develops faster, and i am asking ALL players not only the big guys!)
in our banish 4/5 participants get more coins and credits than in any other of the banishes and now you want to add 3 more banishes AND restrict them to 2 per day? (thats right its 3 because its for 3 realms!) you go ahead and try to coordinate the entire server you are on, but i guarantee you that no one else will do that on any other server to spread out the players to not fall on all banishes (except the 2 where the top guy is) behind to the 25 or even the 5m banishes.
i am not sure if you understand that i would embrace a banish for myself, finally being able to boost 100% again and pull of 80-100% at it, hog the 10m bonus everytime and have no more troubles with 200m coins daily... i am saying this is a really bad idea for everyone else, except for the top dog of each server.



finally someone who gets it! ty

You are here on this thread arguing against an idea that would benefit servers that have a good population of players. We have separate issues than you do.. that is obvious. Your time and effort and arguments would be far better served on threads regarding Server merges because it sounds like that is what your real issue is. Tynon is being incredibly irresponsible by allowing servers to exist with barely enough players to make the game a worthwhile endeavor for those who have already invested time and money into their game, but yet continues to create and open up new servers. I would encourage you to make a lot of noise and stand up for your server and your rights as a player by trying to fix what is really wrong instead of trying to squash my efforts in trying to fix a different kind of problem that pertains to well populated servers. I am truly sorry that your server is dead.. that is probably the worst thing Tynon can allow to happen.

[kaisim_2492829]

You are here on this thread arguing against an idea that would benefit servers that have a good population of players. We have separate issues than you do.. that is obvious. Your time and effort and arguments would be far better served on threads regarding Server merges because it sounds like that is what your real issue is. Tynon is being incredibly irresponsible by allowing servers to exist with barely enough players to make the game a worthwhile endeavor for those who have already invested time and money into their game, but yet continues to create and open up new servers. I would encourage you to make a lot of noise and stand up for your server and your rights as a player by trying to fix what is really wrong instead of trying to squash my efforts in trying to fix a different kind of problem that pertains to well populated servers. I am truly sorry that your server is dead.. that is probably the worst thing Tynon can allow to happen.

but it doesnt help your server either, or are you saying that players like matt, herby, etc are on less populated servers? look, i still think this is a really bad idea, instead of keep on repeating your old argument that has been rejected and proven wrong several times, maybe you should take a second look at it and try to argue with someone else. its a bad idea and repeating your same old points wont change anything about that. just the fact alone that you are looking at my server as an "exception" already proves you wrong since we are talking about game population majorities and not your single case and a handfull of players that it would regard.
i said enough, keep on arguing and ignoring my points i made but i highly recommend to rethink your idea and come up with something better or hold your peace.