Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: [Suggestion] Replace Guild Wars

  1. #11
    Sorry people but as long as the alt guilds and alt players are not banned no idea is going to help the honest players. On my server the alt guilds own citys, overbid, pass their big guns around so no one can take their cities. If you want a better game then get tynon support off of its dead a** and clean this game up. Now they have a way to cheat at baal and cerb. 70 mill players are doing more damage then 170 mill players. 8 players and Big Cerb goes down in 20 minutes 2 70 mill players score in the 40% plus range.

  2. #12
    Ironheart jkwongfl_7919855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Nomadz
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Moonshadeaux_3172622 View Post
    Sorry people but as long as the alt guilds and alt players are not banned no idea is going to help the honest players. On my server the alt guilds own citys, overbid, pass their big guns around so no one can take their cities. If you want a better game then get tynon support off of its dead a** and clean this game up. Now they have a way to cheat at baal and cerb. 70 mill players are doing more damage then 170 mill players. 8 players and Big Cerb goes down in 20 minutes 2 70 mill players score in the 40% plus range.
    Power means nothing, especially so in banish.
    my naga, my naga

  3. #13
    Ironheart Joker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Avenger
    Posts
    444
    Having buffs attached to guild level won't work as that way the host and Vice host can just boot the top players once they have reached a specific level. Currently they wont do that as they wil start losing cities if they do thus keeping everyone in line.
    Joker - Europe Servers



    You don't really know GW till you play outside servers 1-10


    Quote Originally Posted by Andy View Post
    Giving a handicam to the players that die in GW will make the smaller guilds more competitive.
    Quote Originally Posted by DrthCaedus View Post
    tokens don't do much anyway.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    Having buffs attached to guild level won't work as that way the host and Vice host can just boot the top players once they have reached a specific level. Currently they wont do that as they wil start losing cities if they do thus keeping everyone in line.
    Yikes... you seem to play with mean people.

  5. #15
    Forum Moderator Morgan le Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Clarity
    Posts
    2,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    Having buffs attached to guild level won't work as that way the host and Vice host can just boot the top players once they have reached a specific level. Currently they wont do that as they wil start losing cities if they do thus keeping everyone in line.
    Why would they boot the top players if they can help their team win an alternative event to GWs? Anyway no host worth their salt would do that, whether they help keep cities or not. Having the best in their guild is a coup. Not to mention they are usually the best contributors.

    Forum Moderators are volunteers and are unable to fix in game problems

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    Having buffs attached to guild level won't work as that way the host and Vice host can just boot the top players once they have reached a specific level. Currently they wont do that as they wil start losing cities if they do thus keeping everyone in line.
    I agree with what Joker has said.


    With no guild wars, the top coiners don't have a reason for their tenure in a guild to be secure.

    The host and VHs will wield too much power, since the guild will have all their buffs with no need to defend them.

    Alts will only multiply, moreso than they are now.


    Morgan, you didn't think that part through.

    The guild buffs need to be earned, defended, and possibly lost. Otherwise, there's no reason to try recruiting/maintaining the strong players to your guild anymore.


    I know where you are coming from, since I also played in the earlier servers before.

    Guild wars in servers 1-10 is boring and lifeless. Its just your guild vs your alt guilds from your realm. B-A. done.

    You really should realize that this is not how guild wars is played in the majority of the other servers.
    Last edited by Herby; 06-09-2014 at 12:44 AM.

  7. #17
    Lightbringer
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    WhoreHouse
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by Herby View Post
    I agree with what Joker has said.


    With no guild wars, the top coiners don't have a reason for their tenure in a guild to be secure.

    The host and VHs will wield too much power, since the guild will have all their buffs with no need to defend them.

    Alts will only multiply, moreso than they are now.


    Morgan, you didn't think that part through.

    The guild buffs need to be earned, defended, and possibly lost. Otherwise, there's no reason to try recruiting/maintaining the strong players to your guild anymore.


    I know where you are coming from, since I also played in the earlier servers before.

    Guild wars in servers 1-10 is boring and lifeless. Its just your guild vs your alt guilds from your realm. B-A. done.

    You really should realize that this is not how guild wars is played in the majority of the other servers.
    Server 1 actually has a realm with alot more activity than most of the server wide GW, Please have the facts to hand before you think you know best.
    GW should be replaced, but with a more up to date version.
    Things are getting Dated, Just waiting on the Devs i suppose.
    What I Speak is the Truth...
    What YOU delete must hurt you

  8. #18
    Forum Moderator Morgan le Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Clarity
    Posts
    2,023
    How would it create more alts than there is now? Apart from being feeders and maps there would be no other use for them. The need for them in GWs have been taken out of the equation. Unless you are prepared to coin up you alts too, it'll be a long time before they acquire the better buffs anyway. Level 5 will take some doing if it's alts only.

    Servers 1-10 for the most part really don't have to work at keeping cities but do any of the hosts and VHs wield unnecessary force? No. Are any of the big players kicked so the host can feel better about their egos? No. There is some movement due to gaining more in Banish but that's squarely on the players themselves. Never once have I ever heard of a player being kicked out of a guild in any game for doing too well.

    I have hosted and played in guilds and alliances in many different games. One thing I have noticed that if any host becomes a despot, that team quickly disintegrates. Ironically with the big players leading the mutiny. So trust me Hosts and VHs bullying members won't be a problem.

    Forum Moderators are volunteers and are unable to fix in game problems

  9. #19
    Thanks for the thread.
    What i understand is wants more rewards and fun at GW.
    My idea is split GW into Guild Level start from L3 guild
    L3 guild
    Those L3 guild in server are right to bid 5 cities its call class 3 cities
    total of 5 city are to fight between L3 guilds only.

    L4 guild
    They have class 4 cities which are 5 city given rep: and 3 city for additional income.(fight between L4 guilds only)

    L5 guild
    They have class 5 cities which are 5 city given rep: 3 city for additional income and 3 guild chest additional..(fight between L5 guilds only)

    L6 guild
    They have class 6 cities which are 5 city given rep: 3 city for additional income, 3 guild chest additional and 100% pirate rewards..(fight between L6 guilds only)


    L7 Guild
    They have class 7 cities which are 5 city given rep: 3 city for additional income, 3 guild chest additional, 100% pirate rewards and 1 free laby.(fight between L7 guilds only)


    L8 Guild
    They have class 7 cities which are 5 city given rep: 3 city for additional income, 3 guild chest additional, 100% pirate rewards, 1 free laby and 150 stam..(fight between L7 guilds only)


    so all Level guild will benefit from GW once the Lower level guild they think strong enough to go another level,
    they will upgrade and fight with another guild.
    so lower level player and lower level guild will still play in the game and they will get city buff.
    meanwhile those lower guild can be united and stronger, so some day they can be match for higher class city and guild.

    This is just my 2 cent idea whether come true or not it’s up to tynon

    Anyway
    'Keep going with the suggestions!'
    SO KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
    "NEVER DIE TRYING"
    LET’S POST IT
    Last edited by BLITZBLITZWOLF_4797025; 06-09-2014 at 03:03 AM.

  10. #20
    If there are only 1 same level guild in entire server what those players in guild going to do?

    GW will having bid everyday if there is no other same level guild in server NPCS will bid (Tynon will bid)

    Who are those NPCS?
    NPCS 1: Player's Clone who join the GW. so you have to fight against your clone at GW
    NPCS 2: multi range power of banesh boss camp A and camp F so guildies need to split team to def from losing cities.

    What do you think?
    Last edited by BLITZBLITZWOLF_4797025; 06-09-2014 at 03:16 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •