Quote Originally Posted by service_8572198 View Post
So u would sanc a hero poorly and star it to 18 then fix the sancs?

My own preference is to transfer the sancs till i get a good transfer, then while dropping the few bad sancs and increasing to the limit while starring
I do it this way because it will be quite a while b4 I reach 18stars, assumed it was the same for most players

Maybe im doing it ass about face but it seems most efficient to me
well no, i wouldnt sanc a hero bad on purpose (not that i have any influence on what i get), but on the other hand i am not in the position yet to make a domi5 in under an hour either. so when i currently random transfer sancts onto a new hero and hope for the best it ends up being an A1 to AA3 or so and then i would add other cards over time. i dont have influence on the turnout, but if the stats are acceptable, i take it.
those 18 star heroes and changing sancts on those are endgame and for players that have nothing other to do than improving further.
so instead of paying 1-2k gems in removal fees on 5-10 sancts on an 18 stared domi5 they might as well take their chances and spend 200m coins on transfer fees to get new random stats.
i dont know about you but when i get to the point where for example blayd says he is and have all heroes maxed out and 18 stars, i might as well transfer a hero i am not happy with to take my chances and do this instead.
so when someone got a 17 star hero he/she might as well add an 18th star before the transfer to not loose any. i get the thoughts from DNX and see how its nice to know that you dont loose stars on transfer after a certain point. plus the game will hopefully improve in the future and maybe someone feels the need to transfer from an old 18 star hero he most likely wont use anymore onto a new hero that just entered the game.